Livestock Emergency Guidelines Standards

11 Figure 4. The Participator y Response Identification Matrix (PRIM) Technical options Livelihoods objectives Emergency phases Immediate Protect assets Rebuild assets Destocking - - - Vet support ***** Feed *** Water Shelter Provision of livestock Figure 4 Consider the three LEGS objectives against each of the technical options With stakeholders, add scores to show how much the technical option could impact on each LEGS objective Set the phases of the for slow-onset, rapid-onset, and complex emergencies With stakeholders, add arrows CHAPTER *** *** **** **** emergency - these dier bene ts to show the relevance of the technical option across the dierent phases of the emergency In Somalia, when we were planning an emergency livestock treatment campaign, we needed to coordinate with FAO and other actors.The PRIM really helped in bringing together key stakeholders and coordinating planning. Awais Nasser Khan, Livestock Specialist, ICRC Somalia Delegation ’ ‘ LEGS discusses the key issues (including cross-cutting themes such as gender and protection) for each possible technical intervention and provides a review of the advantages and disadvantages of various sub-options, and a decision tree (Figure 5) to highlight key questions that need to be addressed before a par ticular response is implemented. These are followed by specific standards, key actions and guidance notes for each intervention and option.